"The Pavias argued not only were the number (200+) and content of the communications outrageous, but that by sending the faxes to George Pavia's law firm and to the tenant's places of business, Couri intended to harass, threaten and intimidate the Pavias and the tenant to accede to Couri's demands regarding his complaints about his tenancy."
--- From the Decision and Order of the Hon. Joan A. Madden, Supreme Court, State of New York, June 25, 2007.
Saturday, June 25, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment